What is the difference between ecw smackdown and raw
The reintroduction of Saturday Night's Main Event have also led to interbrand supercards. The tradition in giving the Royal Rumble winner a shot at the heavyweight championship at WrestleMania was also altered as a result of the brand extension and the separation of the men's titles in - initially for , the Rumble winner was slated to face their brand's champion which led to the match between Brock Lesnar and Kurt Angle , while in , a supposed "loophole" in tradition allowed SmackDown!
Since then, the Rumble winner has the choice of which champion to face at WrestleMania , allowing the winner a chance to change shows. Because of this arrangement, there is no special accolade given to the highest-finishing wrestler of the losing brand at the Rumble.
However, the losing brand i. It is a ladder match where six men square off to retrieve a briefcase containing a contract. The contract guarantees the winner a world title shot anytime in the following year good up until the subsequent WrestleMania. The match was a RAW brand exclusive match-up in , but in , the match became inter-promotional, and SmackDown superstars were added to the mix. Wrestlers could appear on two or conceivably all three shows temporarily as part of an ongoing storyline.
Examples of such instances include the aforementioned Rumble winner attempting to see which champion he will choose to face, the brand-versus-brand storyline in which wrestlers from the one brand performing run-ins in the other brands' shows, or one-time reunions that see two wrestlers from separate brands teaming up together.
Some have criticized the theoretical separation of talent, as interbrand competition was originally intended to be a novelty for the major shows but has occurred in increasing frequency in the first few years of the extension: in , RAW 's World Tag Team Champions were put on Armageddon , a SmackDown event, while in , Cyber Sunday , a RAW event, saw the champions of each brand facing off against each other.
Although wrestlers were on separate brands, with each brand getting one show, the pay-per-view events were at the start shared between the two shows - this changed in June , when WWE Bad Blood became the first RAW -exclusive pay-per-view event worldwide the RAW -exclusive WWE Insurrextion pay-per-view was held before this in May but was only shown however in the United Kingdom. From then on, each pay-per-view event, with the exception of the major pay-per-views, would be show-exclusive. Even in the joint pay-per-views, inter-brand matches would be limited to the Royal Rumble main event, King of the Ring before it became defunct , SummerSlam , Survivor Series and WrestleMania , and the intermittent brand versus brand storyline.
Every wrestler would be important in the context of his or her show, so every match and every interview would be important. Enjoy our content? Join our newsletter to get the latest in sports news delivered straight to your inbox! Your sports. With Family Sharing set up, up to six family members can use this app.
App Store Preview. Nov 5, Version Ratings and Reviews. Aditya N. App Privacy. Size Category Entertainment. Compatibility iPhone Requires iOS Languages English. Price Free. CM: SmackDown's men's singles division is head and shoulders above Raw's.
A big reason for that is how they keep it fresh by having main event stars compete for the U. The Miz is awesome, but what does it say about Raw when its top champion comes and goes as he pleases? Like AJ Styles said on an episode of Talking Smack , SmackDown makes the stars, and Raw comes in to reap the rewards after all the hard work is done building them up.
EB: What Raw lacks in fresh new talent, it makes up for with the sense of urgency with which it approaches its singles stars. Ditto Samoa Joe, who instantly made the jump from NXT and was positioned as a legitimate star at the next level.
The same can be said for Finn Balor, who made his debut and became universal champion in mere weeks. In fact, the idea SmackDown is responsible for Raw's top singles stars is debatable, at best. The company took Jason Jordan from the scrap heap on Tuesdays and made him a star. It took Miz from the midcard and has him feuding with legitimate main event stars like Reigns. Even someone like Crews, wallowing away in the SD midcard, has come over and found a niche on Raw.
The red brand has elevated Enzo Amore, Big Cass, Elias, a rejuvenated Goldust and Neville through increased exposure on the flagship show to the point that any of them can utilize the credibility they have from working Monday nights to jump to SmackDown during the next Superstar initiative and portray legitimate main eventers. Look at Mahal, whose work with Reigns, Rollins and Balor this past spring is often underrated when discussing his rise to prominence on Tuesdays.
It can be argued SmackDown does not do the work in getting singles stars ready for Raw but, rather, the flagship gives them exposure to the point lifelong midcarders can find success at the top of the SD card. Except for Zayn, who can't catch a break on either roster apparently. Balor has been stuck in a feud with Bray Wyatt that everyone is hoping will end sooner rather than later, and Wyatt has been all but destroyed by a lack of credible wins.
Jordan is a great hand in the ring, but you can hear a pin drop during his entrance. Elias gets good reactions for his songs, but he has yet to put on a memorable match with anyone on the main roster.
Reigns may be a top star in the eyes of the company, but he still has many critics. Mahal has a lot of work to do before he can be taken seriously as a champion, but at least WWE is doing what needs to be done to get him heel heat, even if it rubs some people the wrong way.
When it comes to potential WrestleMania matches, I would much rather see Nakamura vs. Styles than Reigns vs. EB: Raw is a brand targeting the casual audience, with recognizable faces and names like Reigns and Lesnar. No, it does not properly utilize its stars all of the time, but the argument can be made that SmackDown has not, either. Mahal is cracking race-based jokes about Nakamura. That feud does not need it.
Styles and Corbin are feuding because
0コメント