Should i join fanfiction.net

And some freeform tags are quite hilarious. It's true that sometimes it isn't easy to avoid crossovers in AO3 but it takes only a second to see that a story is a crossover. I use both, and a lot of other platforms, such as Qutev is that how you spell it? I love both, my only complaint for FF.

I'm waiting for Knighty to patch up Fimfiction and release a sister site for everything, because it just feels far more modern than either of the two above. I personally think that the Archive is a much better website. Of course, they both have their pros and cons:. I think FFN is an easier experience for readers since the reading part of the site's a lot easier to use, you can edit how the text looks, etc, without having to deal skins of Archive I think having to create mandatory in-site documents is a pain in the ass, because every time I want to post a chapter of a story I need to do a ten-minute workaround of the site in order to get it up- and the stupid little copy-paste box on the site is so teeny-tiny that it's super annoying to use.

The sites a little ugly, but I think that I biggest con to the site. I actually don't mind the tagging system since Archive seemed to have updated so that you can filter things out, now- , and i find soem of the "meaningless" tags that authors put in to eb quite halrious. Its just another form of expression for the story, and if you don't care for it then you don't have to pursue the tags. You can just read the summary or skip the story.

I don't mind the adult content, either I find that the openness to adult content also causes more mature, older authors to come to the site, which allows me to have better discussions in the comments. Not to mention that the story quality is ultimately higher on Archive than it is on FFN, and you can far more easily post and find Orginal Work, which is something I'm interested in reading.

Archive also has some reading options like reading the whole work on a single page that aren't available on FFN. I primarily use a laptop while using these two sites, so the mobile issue doesn't really affect me.

I think it's really up to personal preference on which site is better since everyone is looking for different things from the sites. When I'm looking for something to read, I go to Archive first a foremost. I will say that, as things currently stand, and as someone who has used both sites, I definitely prefer AO3 nowadays. In all honesty, the only reasons I post things back to FF.

AO3 has even improved on several of the things that were listed as complaints here, like the ability to filter whether you see crossovers, or to filter out certain tags entirely.

Uploading and even editing is easier than on FF, because the AO3 uploading system is copy-and-paste-text based. If you need to go back and edit a bad wording or detail, you don't have to edit the original file and reupload.

Additionally, individual chapters' Author's Notes don't bump up the word count, because there's an actual separate "Notes" field for every chapter! I was thinking about joining AO3 for my ideas that don't belong on my Tumblr, I have an account on FFN but I can't use the writing software that they tell me to use so I can't write there at all. So I was thinking about joining Ao3 since I enjoyed many fics from there as well but the invitation thing has me worried and I have no idea if AO3 wants me to use some writing software like FFN wants.

Or is it like Wattpad which I don't use anymore where I can just go and start writing right away, which was the only I liked about Wattpad. As a reader, the features are simple and easy to use. It does get frustrating when some of the fics aren't ''good,'' but everyone has to start somewhere, especially when it comes to Mary Sues and beginner's writing. Review are meant to give constructive criticism, and if some authors tried hard enough, they can get a beta to help them.

It does get annoying when you clearly see that the author didn't proofread or use spell check. I think the good stories out number the bad. You can try to guess when seeing the summary, the number of favs, follows, and reviews. That's not saying that everyone else has your tastes, but it gives a good idea to what's popular and most of the time, the quality. I constantly comb through the site to find some gems, and if you look hard enough, you can too. Most authors give warnings to M rated content, especially smut, and have trigger warnings if their stories need it.

FFN also has some of the best crossovers I have ever read. The filtering is helpful even though you can only tag four characters, but you can search for 'Completed' stories so that you don't have to worry about it being abandoned or on hiatus. Communities can help with having a place for stories with similar content.

If you want time travel fics or a particular ship, they are very helpful. They can even only include 'well written' stories. There are some really good writers there, like AO3, but to me, it's easier to find. Authors can be nice in sending a Private Message in reply yo a review or following and favoriting a story. Some answer in their next chapter and always express their gratitude at the bottom in an AN. I love that there's a dark mode for reading at night, and you can also adjust the text size.

With the app, you can change the font, download stories, and the tags 'In progress' and 'Complete' tell the reader the status of the story. I do like the Kudos feature and you can order stories chronologically. It is nice that you can post more than just fanfics, but that's what I want to find. I don't like that you have to wait to join.

I go occasionally, but it never made me want to visit frequently. Because I don't have an account, I have to bookmark which doesn't let me know if updated. I know that they both have their pros and cons and I respect that. I personally believe AO3 is so much better than FanFiction.

They have so many mistakes. I don't mean grammar. I mean the misspelling of simple words and not even capitalizing the first word in a sentence and proper nouns.

I feel like because FFN has banned M fanfics, many of the older, more experienced writers go to AO3, and poor FFN is stuck with those 10 year olds who can't write not saying that I can even though I'm older, but they definitely can't either. Even though I don't really read M fics, I like to have the option.

The people who do get away with writing those on FFN are usually really bad at writing them, while writers on AO3 write it more tastefully. That said, FFN does have some good writers. Still, AO3 definitely is better. I've used both FFN and AO3 for reading and writing for at least 6 years now so let me add some more comparisons!

First of all, AO3 has recently added some 'Excluded' filters and they're amazing so that solves one of the criticisms of that! This makes it a lot harder to plagiarise your work. It's a lot easier to upload and edit a in AO3 because you have to go through a lot of hoops in FFN just for that.

You can have a 'Night mode' theme as you read in FFN but in AO3, you'll only have that if the author chooses a 'skin' like that in their stories. Well, that's all I can think of for now.

Personally, I mainly use AO3 for reading because a lot of fandoms I'm in seem to upload more stories there. I prefer ao3 of the two- a lot of its problems have actually be fixed in the recent years. I use it and wattpad most often but FanFiction. At first, I leaned more towards FFN simply because I was familiar with it and used to going there automatically, but a lot of stories she recommended were only on AO3 so I had no choice but to use it, and eventually, I ended up going there automatically.

Not only is the quality of work there better, but the tag system when used correctly is really helpful. Some authors use way too many tags, but I think that serves as a warning in itself to not read that story. AO3 also doesn't have as many stories as FFN, but when you have to filter through 10, pieces of trash to get anything good anyway, it's actually an even balance.

I still use FFN for a few stories that are regularly updated exclusively on that site and on the odd chance I might find something else good there even though I honestly feel like I've read all the good ones. In the end, FFN still has a place in my heart; and a few really good authors that write for some older anime fandoms that simply don't have much of a following on AO3. But AO3 has got my attention for the most part due to its newer fandoms, both anime and western, that I can't find on FFN plus they sometimes post my old fandoms on there and superior quality writing.

For me it's AO3 all the way. I find FFN's format unpleasant to read to the point where I simply don't bother reading fics posted there. I haven't even bothered posting anything to FFN; I've posted close to 5 dozen stories to AO3 and I love the interface and its simple upload mechanism. It does have some weaknesses - outlined in the article - but it's the one that works for me. AO3 has the best search engine of any fanfic site I've ever seen. And there are ways to filter out things. You just have to go into the 'filter' section and in the little box that says 'search within results', just write -"[insert tag here]" and it will.

As a reader, I prefer AO3 by a long shot. FFN has so much bad fanfics. I cannot stand the bad grammar, horrible plot, cliches and no character development. This was all fine when I was young and new to the world of fanfics. I have to get out of the story before I read a words. On the other hand, I like the tagging system on AO3 because I can literally search for certain content online without any trouble.

Also, it gives me warnings if I want to avoid certain content because I am not delving into that anytime soon. Yes it is mostly smut and focused on male homosexual couples.

As a fujoshi if you don't know, look it up , I like the offerings of those content. Along with it, I can read a story with actual plots. It offers the best of both worlds. However, I would have to say FFN does offer advantages. I do like the crossover system offered in this website. It is literally impossible to go through all of this in AO3. Also, it has more anime fanfic which may be important for some.

With AO3, I am exposed to many different fandoms I was unfamiliar with which would mean I am not entirely focused on animes and mangas. Still I like to go back to FFN to read some anime fanfics every once in a while. But because it provides more anime fanfic, I also noticed many of the users are younger. This would mean that the writers do not have as much experience writing fanfics which means no character development, mary sues, cliches, no plot development, bad grammar and bad spelling.

I do like that FFN has more fanfics on older media. Whenever I want to read something about an anime from a decade ago, I do go to FFN to read some even if there are not as much new fanfics on that media anymore. I go to FFN every couple months so I do notice the 1 or 2 new fanfics on that media.

Navigating between the 2 websites is pretty easy so i do not have much complaints. One day, I noticed all my favorite fanfics somehow disappeared. I loved those stories. I favorited and bookmarked those stories. Then one day, they were all gone. No matter how much I searched, they were not there. So many good fanfics which may have been considered mature content but did not have smut were just gone.

To this day, I am haunted by the paths those stories could have been taken if they were not deleted. I would rather prefer to know the authors lost inspiration and abandoned the story rather than knowing they were deleted and it took too much work to rewrite the whole thing so they abandoned it.

Reasons being that 1. The pairing tag. Ao3's lack of restrictions on sexual content is nice too since I don't have to worry about a fic crossing too deeply into sexual territory and I'll admit I like reading smut every now and then. I have noticed that Quality of fanfic on Archive of our own is definitely superior but one of my biggest complaints is every single fanfic in there except for Game of thrones Fandom is male x male pairing.

I don't want pairing in my Fanfic and even if i do, i definitely dont want male on male action. I am not even kidding, almost the fanfics in most of the fandoms are gay fanfics. I dont have anything against gay people, but i dont want that in my fic, thank you very much. I devoured almost every story on it and well latter I decided to look for another site for different stories and found archive of our own.

Also the stories are sweeter and dare to Soften House much more. They are more flexible to turn him into a more caring and nicer guy. Fan Fiction. Net has a much more variety of Fluff, it's more heart melting the way he is portrayed on those stories. The ones who write on archive BDSM do it very carefully meanwhile in the other ends up looking disturbing with a bad after taste.

I honestly prefer AO3 however. First off, as a writer, I tend to not only get more views, but I get more people who either want me to continue, or explain that they like what I have done so far. With FFN, this doesn't happen. Not to mention I can review a story on AO3 and the author can reply. I also find that uploading to AO3 is much easier, as is editing. I also really like the tag system. And yes, there are some problems I have with not being able to filter out tags or get more adult-oriented works that pop up than what I like, I also find it so much easier when looking for a specific author, work or tag.

I'm able to find what I want, I can find the ships I'm looking for, even the characters. I also like the way that you can look for a certain amount of words. On FFN, I like that the hits show me which chapters were read and how many chapters. AO3 only shows me how many visits to the story were made, so someone could have clicked on my first chapter and gone "Nah", and stopped reading, and another might have been enthralled and read all 40 chapters at one shot, but each would register as 1 hit.

But the reviews I've received on FFN so far have been crap. On AO3 I've found readers are far more generous with their comments. Remember, you aren't going to write your best if you are tired and have to force yourself to keep writing. This method is very likely to work if you are talented at writing. If not, follow people's advice to improve, and soon you will become a great author! Try to be nice to everyone who asks you a question or reviews you, even if it isn't helpful or is just downright annoying.

You don't want to be seen as a horrible person on your way to the top. Speaking from personal experience: I wrote my first FanFiction for the Pride and Prejudice section and I believe that it is a great fandom for beginners because it is so huge that you will get views no matter what and the readers are used to a great deal of variety. They will offer criticism, but are over all open to new stories. No matter how good people you know say your writing is, it can always be improved.

Try to take on board what someone says if they say if the review has effort visibly put into it and is constructive. It will make you a much better writer. Submit a Tip All tip submissions are carefully reviewed before being published. Don't try too hard to be popular on FFN. Very few people make it, but it'll be a big reward if you do! Helpful 16 Not Helpful 3. Related wikiHows How to. How to. Co-authors: Updated: August 10, Categories: Fan Fiction.

Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 57, times. This has really helped me! More reader stories Hide reader stories. Did this article help you? Cookies make wikiHow better. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. About This Article Co-authors: You are a self righteous person. Statistics numbers doesnt always predict correctly, and it's someone like you who could made some authors turn their back on FFnet, after what you did to them.

Computer program still made mistakes, and I heard that those authors of FFnet was not impressive with what you've done. Especially after some of those deleted stories were technically innocent of the charges you set upon. I dont mind if you do something to those plagiarist, but some stories that had been deleted had some potential to growth. Just because it's not as impressive to you at the beginning, doesnt meant that they couldnt learn from their mistakes.

That's what reviews are for! They would tell the writer whether they like the stories or not. And, what's wrong with some stroking of the authors ego?

Humans likes to hear others approval to motivate them. Without ones, more often than not they tend to think that it's no use to continue what they do. And what would be of FFnet if because of you, some if not most of their loyal members decided to reroute their works elsewhere?? I've seen many who had re-considered to post their work because of that program of yours. Then the end of FFnet could be attributed to you too, dont you think?

Since you seems like to critics so much, I wonder if you would reply to this one kindly. I've been reading FanFiction since July , and I created an account at the very beginning of November of that year. While I realize that your points about the lack of new members are valid, I also think that you're failing to realize how dedicated some of us are to these stories, and the importance of this.

Yes, it's a shame that there may at some point be a minimal amount of contributors, but at the end of the day, the site should be about the love of the topics, rather than the number of people reading these stories. We'll still be there as long as our favorite stories are.

That having been said, your statistics were definitely interesting, and it is a sad fact that many stories have been deserted or put on hiatus. Also, if Ashley is still on here: In my experience on the site, there are numerous stories with Mary Sues, however they're not popular and are generally treated with disdain.

I personally am a female in my teenage years, and I would have to say the gender and age of members really do vary between topics and genres. To Anonymous comment directly above : You would be amazed at the popularity of Mary-Sues, not just in fanfiction but in original fiction. Just because Mary-Sues are disdained by a critical portion of the public doesn't mean they aren't popular. If they weren't popular at least with writers there wouldn't be so many out there!

But what I'm mostly interested in is the way that readers self-insert into main characters, and Mary-Sue is obviously a site for that phenomenon.

While gender and age do vary, statistics I have found other places have shown that fanfiction is overwhelmingly written and read by women. The reason I want clear statistics is to see if this is true, and what the actual numbers might be. Demographics would be informative to get a hold of, but FFN does not individually collect such information unlike its service providers, Google included.

From experience, I know surveys are hopeless on a site as varied as FFN, so it's difficult to suggest an efficient method of gathering information for free. Be sure that as soon as it becomes available, though, it will appear here. Dear other Anonymous: They were not impressed. Not "they were not impressive. The thing that I think is the best case scenario for the site, but would completely negate this research, would be the emergence of another media hyped fandom source like Harry Potter or Twilight that would help to create a new source for material for writers and readers.

I think that there needs to be more insight into the function of the mega-fandoms and how they effect FFNet and how each time one of those fan-sources are created effect the growth of the site. With the Harry Potter books long completed and the last movie looming, and the same situation being true for Twilight, I could understand how participation in the site may be slowing.

However, it would be interesting to see how media booms help to bolster the site, and how interest drops once a series has been completed for some time. I know this was posted a long time ago, but it is still an interesting read!

Thank you! Next month, I will have officially been on FFnet for a year! I think FFN could continue to grow as it is one of the greatest Fiction sites in my belief, mainly because it's the only fiction site I've found that notifies you when a story you follow or an author you follow has updated.

I am glad for this as it will be a great help to my essay, that is due tomorrow. Sunday, 18 July FanFiction. Net Member Statistics. The research team is proud to present you first numerics from our user-related queries. This post answers many questions, including the following: -How many writers are there on FFN? First, we must present the methodology , though. The study consisted of generating random user account IDs spanning from 1 to 2,, source data at the bottom.

It allows us to generate representative unbiased results at a The list has been generated on the 29th of June Now, the definitions. You will see the following criteria used in this post: Empty account: any account that does not host stories uploaded by the owner.

In layman terms, there are no stories posted in this account. There may be favourites. Seriously, if you don't like the site, leave. You've been a member for four days - it's not like you have much invested here. The article you posted mentions that the people whining about this site were in the process of setting one up. They've had twelve years to do so, so it should be well established by now. I think the validity of that article is kind of tempered by, among other things, their defence of Cassandra Claire.

She didn't "forget to cite" and she wasn't run out by "jealous" people. Her fics consisted almost wholly of entire verbatim passages ripped out of dozens of published copyrighted works. She ripped off everything from relatively obscure fantasy novels to Buffy to Blackadder to freaking Malcolm in the Middle. Pet peeve: "Cassie isn't a plagiarist! You're just jealous!!!!!

I'll just say this, any editorialized article I happen read, I always consider the source of the material. Are they trustworthy and unbiased? Are their facts and statistics sound? Where do their facts and statistics come from? Then, if intrigued, I'll do my own research. I never trust any "information" based on someone else's say so without investigating it myself. Aside from that, I feel compelled to wonder what exactly is the motivation behind posting such an old "article" in the first place.

At this late date , is it really "newsworthy" to be told that the admins of big websites such as FanFiction always have the power to find out what e-mail address you used to register your account as a contributor to that site, and what ISP you normally use when visiting, and that they can delete anything you posted if they, for any reason, feel their site would be better off without it, and also they can also delete your entire account if they, for any reason, decide the site would be better off without you?

Heck, within the last couple of years, I've twice had some of my favorite sets of forums get permanently deleted by the admins of the sites which had previously hosted those forums!

I still miss those forums, but life goes on! Your IP isn't personal? It doesn't contain any personal information at all like a vague idea of your location? Sites don't sometimes warn you when your IP is public? You would be ok if your IP was public? Or your email like what happened when Ecks had a fall out with the other mods. Emails are personal, some contain personal info and phishing happens. This isn't scaremongering. Ecks, former staff, is Hale.

This is what Hale did: On her wiki, Laura and her staff would occasionally connect someone's legal and fannish name if they felt that the link was obvious enough already. Someone like that ran FFN. It's not like FFN has a privacy statement or there are any minors who could suffer. Looking back, I see I allowed myself to get sucked into a debate of something I wasn't even trying to debate.

Now, of course, I am skeptical of any editorial article disguised as fact, especially from an obviously biased source, as any responsible person should be, in my opinion. Facts can be manipulated, skewed or omitted entirely to perpetuate the editorial writer's point of view. That is no big secret and happens often. I never asked for proof of what was in the article was true. I only questioned the validity of the source, as I would question any source of biased information, whether it's political or on this site.

However, my initial dismantling of the original posters argument was based on the misinformation touted about how IP addresses and internet advertising work, which I backed up by fact.

It also had to do with the misguided notion of what a background can actually detect or predict. Those were the issues I addressed repeatedly to the OP, not whether or not the information in the original post was true or not.